
If you don’t know what the Chomsky vs Norvig debate is, it started with Chomsky deriding AI researchers about heavily relying on opaque probabilistic models for speech and vision instead of doing “real” science to figure out how the brain actually works. Norvig provided a rebuttal where he claimed that because the probabilistic models are so successful, it “is evidence (but not proof) of a scientifically successful model.”
Young professional woman and busy mom.
-
-
■ @ 2017-11-03 09:33:03.0 di avvelentani
-