Scritto da
Non Autenticato
il 2009-01-28 21:47:00.0 alle 2009-01-28 21:47:00.0
A mio avviso il ragionamento non fa una grinza
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Shockley#Beli... 
"Although Shockley was concerned about both black and white dysgenic effects, he found the situation among blacks more disastrous. While unskilled whites had 3.7 children on average versus an average of 2.3 children for skilled whites, Shockley found from the 1970 Census Bureau reports that unskilled blacks had 5.4 children versus 1.9 for the skilled blacks.[14] Shockley reasoned that because intelligence (like most traits) is inherited, the black population would, over time, become much less intelligent countering all the gains that had been made by the Civil Rights movement."
"Although Shockley was concerned about both black and white dysgenic effects, he found the situation among blacks more disastrous. While unskilled whites had 3.7 children on average versus an average of 2.3 children for skilled whites, Shockley found from the 1970 Census Bureau reports that unskilled blacks had 5.4 children versus 1.9 for the skilled blacks.[14] Shockley reasoned that because intelligence (like most traits) is inherited, the black population would, over time, become much less intelligent countering all the gains that had been made by the Civil Rights movement."
-
Che ne pensate? @ 2009-01-28 21:47:00.0 di Non Autenticato
-
■ @ 2009-01-28 23:16:00.0 di Avve DeLarge
-
■ @ 2009-01-28 22:03:00.0 di Non Autenticato
-
■ @ 2009-01-28 23:08:00.0 di Avve DeLarge
-
-