-
My bet is on Chomsky☺
https://mempko.wordpress.com/2017/11/02/my-bet-is-...
If you don’t know what the Chomsky vs Norvig debate is, it started with Chomsky deriding AI researchers about heavily relying on opaque probabilistic models for speech and vision instead of doing “real” science to figure out how the brain actually works. Norvig provided a rebuttal where he claimed that because the probabilistic models are so successful, it “is evidence (but not proof) of a scientifically successful model.”Young professional woman and busy mom.-
Re: My bet is on Chomsky☺Scritto daavvelentaniCubicolarioil 2017-11-03 09:33:03.0 alle 2017-11-03 09:33:03.0Trollate totali: 18184Scritto da: ::1
>
>
> If you don’t know what the Chomsky vs Norvig debate is, it started with Chomsky deriding AI researchers about heavily relying on opaque probabilistic models for speech and vision instead of doing “real” science to figure out how the brain actually works. Norvig provided a rebuttal where he claimed that because the probabilistic models are so successful, it “is evidence (but not proof) of a scientifically successful model.”
in realta` hanno ragione tutti e due.I think happiness is love
- Vladimir Putin
-
Forum libero
Niente moderazione, niente censura. Registrazione non richiesta.sei napuletano e quindi altro che meticcio, proprio un frullato sei
-
Tutto il forum —
-
- Discussioni: Cronologia Nuove (Per utente) Ultime
- |
- Nuovo messaggio
- |
- Sondaggi
- |
- Inserisci fake ad
- Notizie: Cronologia Nuove (Per utente) Ultime
- |
- Nuova notizia
Mostra notizie nelle discussioni