Forum libero

I have issues with the accuracy of this analogy.
I feel the philosophy and metaphysics references are redundant so I combined and rewritten them.

Philosophy is like searching for a black cat in a dark room. Perhaps the cat was there but someone else has found it and took it away yet we continue to look for the cat that is no longer there, how can we know it? If we found a cat, how can we know the cat was actually the cat we are in search of? How can we know that the animal we have found is truly a cat except for what we perceive through our senses and how can we know our senses are trustworthy? Perhaps our parents, teachers, clergy and even local government has lied to us about the existence of cats and the animal we are holding is really a dog, what logical measuring stick can we use to determine the truth? Furthermore, are we looking for the cat in a way that is in support of our moral values? Is there beauty in looking for and/or finding the cat?

Theology is like being in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn’t there but you choose believe it is there because everyone you have ever known says it is there. You have no reason to believe they would lie to you even though sometimes you question that the cat exists. But the idea of the cat not existing is too painful to contemplate so you continue to search for the cat ignoring all evidence the cat does not exist.

In regards to the science issue, the cat should be easy to spot since the cat is holding a flashlight. Grammar people, grammar!

Science is like using a flashlight to investigate a dark room for a cat that you suspect is there yet you are open to finding things other than a cat. Then bringing your discovery to other people who regularly search dark rooms who then evaluate the validity of whatever it is you have discovered.