-
Osho sull'omosessualitàScritto daNon Autenticatoil 2012-05-31 02:49:44.0 alle 2012-05-31 02:49:44.0

Question – When two Women or two Men are making love to each other. Does it do any harm to their energies?
Osho – Love is always preferable to lovelessness — that is the first thing to be remembered. Love in any kind and any form is more preferable than lovelessness. That is a basic assumption with me. But there are three planes of love. They have to be understood.
The first is auto, the second is homo, the third is hetero. One can be very narcissistic; narcissism is masturbatory. It has many dimensions to it. That is the first kind of love, the most primitive. Every child passes through that state of being narcissistic — he loves only himself, he is his own world. It is good as far as it goes. One has to love oneself; that should be the foundation. If you don’t love yourself you cannot love anybody else. If you can’t even love yourself, how can you love anybody else?
So the foundation is auto-erotic. Each child has to love himself, and parents down the centuries have been preventing it. That’s wrong. Children should be allowed to have fun; nothing is wrong in it. In fact, they are learning the first basic lesson of love — and they can love only themselves. Their consciousness is not so developed that they can bridge with anybody else. They have a small circle of energy; it moves within themselves.
So the first is auto; that is natural. It has been disturbed, it has been disturbed so much that the disturbance persists the whole life. Then other kinds and other planes of love are never as perfect as they could have been. It is only in this century that psychological investigations have proved that auto-love is perfectly natural, normal, and each normal child will be interested in it and he is not to be prevented.
Each child has to play with his own body so that he starts loving his body, so that he becomes sensuous about his body, so that he becomes more and more sensitive about his body, so that he has sheer joy in being in the body. That joy is missing.
If you have not loved your own body ever, then when somebody else loves your body you will shrink because you don’t know how to open. And if you have never loved your body and you have been taught to hate it, despise it, condemn it, when somebody else starts loving your body you will feel, ‘How foolish. How is it possible? How can anybody love MY body?’ And you will not be able to love somebody else’s body either, because bodies are bodies — yours or others, does not make any difference. Body is body.
First the body has to be loved, in deep reverence. In a more enlightened age, children will be taught how to love their body with respect, reverence, because the body is the temple of God. And from there their love will start flowering and will take a right direction.
The second kind of love is homo. That too is normal, natural. First the child loves himself, and then, naturally, he loves somebody who is like himself — that is a natural growth. A boy cannot suddenly love a girl, that is going too far. The girl is so different, another kind of animal. The girl cannot love the boy immediately, a bridge is needed. To move from oneself to the opposite polarity one has to go through somebody like oneself. So from the masturbatory stage love moves to the homosexual stage. The boy will love a boy, the girl will love a girl. This is perfectly natural; there is nothing of pathology in it.
Pathology comes in only when somebody is stuck. If somebody is stuck at the first stage and is not able to love anybody, then there is some pathology. Then somebody can be stuck at the second stage — the second stage is better than the first but lower than the third. One should take the jump and the man should be able to love the woman, and the woman should be able to love the man. That is the hetero stage — the polar opposite. This is the natural course.
And then there is the fourth kind — the transcendence.. When you have passed all these three stages naturally, totally, a moment comes when you transcend sexuality. You are no more interested in sex — sex as such — your body, somebody else’s body . Men’s or women’s bodies don’t interest you. Not that you have any condemnation about the body; in fact, bodies disappear — there are only souls. The body is just the outermost core of it. It is a great shift in your consciousness. That is the fourth stage, the stage of the SIDDHA. In India we have called the fourth stage BRAHMACHARYA — the state of being divine.
But that comes not by denying the third, not by denying the second, not by denying the first. It comes only if you go on fulfilling each plane in its own right.
Now there are a few things to be understood. The hetero relationship is the most difficult relationship, the most inconvenient, conflicting, because two opposite polarities are there — man and woman. They exist differently, hence they are attracted to each other… because they are so different, so mysterious to each other.
Man has never been able to understand how the mind of the woman functions, and so is the case from the woman’s side too. They are such different dimensions, hence the attraction to explore each other. But the difficulty is also there. Men and women love each other and hate each other; are together and are continuously nagging, fighting, struggling. There is a constant effort to dominate the other.
So the hetero relationship is the most inconvenient, although the most fulfilling too. So there is a danger, but there is a thrill. The danger is that there will be conflict, continuous fight. But only through that fight is one fulfilled, and only through that fight does one transcend sex.
The second stage — homo — is far better as far as convenience is concerned. Two men or two women are perfectly at ease with each other; they belong to the same mind, the same quality of energy; they are similar. The homosexual relationship is less troublesome. That’s why homosexuals look gay and heterosexuals look very sad. They are happy people because they are not in a constant fight and struggle and nagging. They understand each other. Lesbians are also happier women — because there is no problem, they function on the same wavelength, so things fit together, there is a rhythm, a kind of harmony. But fulfilment is also less.
Always remember: for the higher you have to pay higher. If you want deep fulfilment you have to take the trouble and you have to stake your life. It is risky.
Because of too much risk, many people have turned homosexual in the world — this world, this century, particularly. People have become alert about heterosexual relationship as being ugly. Continuous fight — who bothers? The whole life is so troubled. One wants to be happy somewhere at least. And even in love there is the same trouble and the same conflict and the same ego struggle. People are turning towards homosexuality. That is relapsing back. It is not good.
The first, the auto-sexual relationship, the relationship with yourself, masturbatory sex, is the most convenient, but there is no fulfilment. With the first there is no inconvenience but no fulfilment — at the most a sexual release. With the second there is a little trouble and a little fulfilment. With the third there is great possibility of both — trouble and fulfilment. They grow in the same proportion. And one should be alert to move from the first to the second, and from the second to the third. Then only can you move to the fourth, BRAHMACHARYA, celibacy.
Now, all over the world religious people have tried for celibacy, but they have not tried it in a scientific way. Somebody simply jumps into celibacy from his childhood. Then your so-called monks remain masturbatory. It is a suspicion of the psychoanalysts — and I think they are right — that the Buddhist monks, the Catholic monks, and all kinds of monks and nuns become masturbatory. Or, the second possibility is that they will turn to homosexuality. Because monks are not allowed to mix with nuns and nuns are not allowed to mix with monks, there is every possibility that they will turn homosexual. That’s what happens in schools, colleges, hostels, in the army, wherever there is only one sex available — people tend to become homosexual. Army people are homosexual.
If you want to avoid homosexuality in the world the army should not be monosexual — there should be women and men together. And the hostels should be for both together, not separate. Then homosexuality will disappear.
Homosexuality has a function to fulfil in the growing child. Somewhere from the first year to the seventh the child remains masturbatory. From the seventh year to the fourteenth the child turns homosexual. From the fourteenth onwards he should, if things go naturally, in a natural way, turn heterosexual. And by the age of forty-two he will start being a celibate. And that celibacy will be a natural, spontaneous phenomenon, not a repression.
You ask: WHEN TWO WOMEN OR TWO MEN ARE MAKING LOVE TO EACH OTHER, DOES IT DO ANY HARM TO THEIR ENERGIES? It does not do any harm but it does not do any benefit either. It is not harmful and it is not beneficial. Masturbation is harmful — beyond a certain stage it is harmful, it is destructive. A masturbatory person loses all contact with the world, he becomes unrelated, he becomes very egoistic because he feels he is enough for himself. there is no need to depend on anybody, not even for love. It is harmful.
Homosexuality is neither harmful nor beneficial. Heterosexuality is very beneficial.
I would like to tell you one anecdote.
‘There are those in this congregation,’ shouted the revivalist, ‘who have committed the unutterable sin of he-ing and she-ing. Stand up and repent!’ Three quarters of the congregation stood up.
‘And those who have committed the double sin of sins: he ing and he-ing. Stand up!’ The rest of the men got up.
‘And I positively know that there are those who have committed that triplest of triple sins: she-ing and she-ing!’ The remaining women all rose, sobbing hysterically. No one was left sitting but one old man.
‘Elder,’ he muttered, ‘how do you stand on me-ing and me-ing?’
These are the four possibilities, in fact, three possibilities of your sexual energy. Either, auto — but auto becomes closed, you become an island. Or, homo — you make a bridge, but you make a bridge man with man, woman with woman. It is not much of a bridge because both are the same. Not much difference is there. Or, hetero — the real pole, polarity, and the real bridge. And only when you have bridged your sexual energies with the polarity does a new kind of integration arise in you, and that integration can become BRAHMACHARYA, can become celibacy.
Don’t think these are sins! These are natural growth points. The only thing to be remembered is: don’t get stuck anywhere. The goal is BRAHMACHARYA, one has to go beyond sex. It is not that there is something wrong in sex, but that which through sex you will have only glimpses of, can be attained totally when you go beyond. In a sexual love moment, for a single second, time disappears, space disappears. For a single moment ego disappears. For a single moment you are lost into the cosmos. That’s why there is so much joy, so much ecstasy. That’s what orgasm is — the individual is lost into the whole.
But this happens only for a single moment, and not even always. So sex only opens a window and closes it again. You have to go beyond sex. Going beyond sex means going beyond the house, the confinement, going under the sun, going into the open sky. Then that ecstasy is yours, and it is constantly yours. A real saint, one whom I call a saint, is continuously in orgasm — that is my definition of a saint. His ecstasy is a natural phenomenon like breathing.
You may not have ever heard a definition like that, but that’s my definition. Jesus or Buddha or Mohammed are continuously in an orgasm. They don’t need anybody, they don’t need to connect with anybody, they don’t need any kind of sexuality. Their energy is constantly orgasmic because they have disappeared into the whole. The part no more exists, no more claims to be the whole. The part has become the whole, the wave has become the ocean — and that is their orgasm, that is their ecstasy.
Out of this ecstasy great songs have been born — Upanishads, Dhammapada, Jesus’ sayings. They are nothing but ecstatic ejaculations, ecstatic expressions. They have tremendous beauty and poetry.
Remember this. These three stages are normal, there is nothing to be condemned in them, but don’t get stuck anywhere. Always go beyond. You have to go beyond, you have to go beyond all kinds of sexuality. Sex is natural, beautiful, but to get stuck in it is to become dormant. Sex gives you glimpses of God. It makes you aware of God. Then one has to seek God in its purity.
Source – Osho Book “Sufis: The People of The Path, Vol 1″
http://www.oshoteachings.com/osho-homosexuality-is...
-
Re: Osho sull'omosessualitàScritto daNon Autenticatoil 2012-05-31 03:17:41.0 alle 2012-05-31 03:17:41.0

Osho – Homosexuality has grown out of a male-dominated world
in Homosexuality Perversions
Osho on Homosexuality and Lesbians
Question – Why are the boys in the muslim heaven so much more nauseating than the golden apsaras without any perspiration, of the hindu paradise? Your condemnation of homosexuality, not only in this lecture, doesn’t seem very compassionate.
Osho – Truth is never compassionate or is always compassionate. It depends on you, how you look at it. One thing is certain: truth is truth — compassionate or not. This has to be understood.
Homosexuality has grown out of a male-dominated world. Homosexuality is a disease because of male domination; it is not a natural phenomenon. And there is every possibility that homosexuality is going to grow more and more — the possibility that even states and governments and religions will start preaching homosexuality. Within fifty years, you will see it happening. Just as governments are now preaching birth control, abortion, they will preach homosexuality — because the population is impossible, and homosexuality is going to be one of the ways to prevent new people coming to the earth.
Sooner or later, each government of the world is going to allow homosexual marriages — men marrying men, women marrying women. This is going to happen. Already, many more people are moving into homosexuality. The disease has come out of male domination. Just as I said the other day, all the cultures that have come out of the Judaic tradition are homosexual: Mohammedan, Christian, Jewish. The reason is, Judaism is one of the most male-oriented communities — it had to be. They have suffered so much; they have been wanderers, for centuries they had no nation, nowhere to live. Of course, the man became more and more powerful — he had to protect the woman, the children — and the society became more and more centered around the man. Only a relaxed society, when things are going beautifully and there is plenty of food and there is no war, becomes heterosexual. Otherwise, when there is war, continuous struggle, the society leans towards male domination.
In the East, homosexuality has never been a problem. In fact, it has existed only in rare cases. Particularly in India, homosexuality has not been a problem at all. It has been so exceptional, it has not even been discussed. The reason? — the country has lived in tremendous peace, well-being, satisfied. Wars have been there, but India has not fought any war on its own. Somebody came — India was always ready to be conquered; it has not bothered much. Those who came were homosexuals — because the army has to be basically male, and all armies become homosexual. Armies — because only men are there — where are they going to put their love, the energy? They are forced to go homosexual.
So any country that has been continuously in war becomes homosexual. Or, male-oriented communities — for example, monasteries: Buddhist monasteries, Jaina monasteries, Catholic monasteries, all became the breeding grounds of homosexuality because only men were allowed. It has not been researched well, but if one goes deep into it, it will be found always that whenever men will be alone together, homosexuality is bound to be there.
Now the same thing is happening in the world of women also, because the women’s lib movement is the first thing in the world up to now where women are meeting with women and basically women oriented groups are being created. Lesbianism is happening. When women are together and against men, where are they going to put their love? The man is the enemy: they have to love women.
Homosexuality and lesbianism both are growing; these are simple facts. A few things to be understood: I am not saying anything against homosexuality — because I know there are many homosexuals around here. If you are not interested in any higher possibilities, homosexuality is as good as heterosexuality. There is no problem in it. If it is only a question of sexual release, homosexuality is as good as heterosexuality. But if you are interested in higher growth, then you will be in trouble.
Each child born is masturbatory, because the child first learns to love himself. That is the only natural way. He knows nobody else, he plays with his own body. each child born is naturally masturbatory: that is his first love. The second stage of his growth is, he becomes homosexual — naturally so. He has loved himself: if he is a boy, certainly he starts loving other boys — his love is spreading. Girls are very far away, a totally different kind of animal. He loves himself — it is easier for him to love other boys. A girl loves herself — it is easier for her to love other girls; the boys are a world apart. This is the second step, NATURAL step: masturbatory, then homosexuality.
Then the third thing, the third wave, is when you start loving the other — the opposite. Man and woman are polarities, and when polarities meet, only then is there challenge. Yes, there is conflict — and that conflict is the challenge. A homosexual love affair can be more convenient, true, because there is not much conflict. Both are alike: they understand each other, they know each other’s ways and each other’s mind. There is no polarity — and if there is no polarity of course there is no conflict, but there is no growth either. With polarity, conflict arises, challenge — to penetrate and know the other, to understand the ways of the other. And it is part of spiritual growth that a man should come to know the woman and the woman should come to know the man.
Why do I say it is part of spiritual growth? Just the other day, I was saying that at the last moment, at the sixth chakra — AJNA chakra — one has to come to a tremendous meeting of the man and the woman. You are also divided inside into two: man and woman. If you cannot meet with the outer woman, it will be very difficult for you to make space for the inner woman. If you cannot love the other on the outside, it will be impossible for you to create a loving space for the other inside you. A man is not only man, he is man-woman together. He is born out of a man and a woman — fifty-fifty percent he is, and so is a woman. and the ultimate inner meeting, the union, the inner alchemy, is possible only if you have learned the ways in the outside world.
When a man falls in love with a woman he is learning something. When a man falls in love with a man he is not learning anything. When a woman falls in love with a man she is learning something — something of the unknown, something of the opposite, something of the quite other. Man and woman in love, means the right hemisphere in love with the left hemisphere.
So if you are interested in spiritual growth then you have to grow from homosexuality towards heterosexuality. If you are not interested in spiritual growth then there is nothing wrong. You can remain — heterosexual or homosexual, it is all the same. I think I have made it clear. If you are not interested in spiritual growth, then there is no problem. I am not against homosexuality, I am not against anything. It is your life — you have to decide; who am I? I am simply stating a fact that ultimately, inside your being, a meeting is going to happen: be prepared for that meeting. And the outer love with the other prepares you.
The more you understand the woman and the man outside you, the more you will have an understanding of the inner polarity. And one day, at the sixth center of your being — what yoga calls AJNA chakra, and yesterday I called “superconsciousness” — there you will feel that your understanding of the woman and the man helps you tremendously. There, intuition and logic meet, imagination and will meet, initiative and reception meet. You will find it easy. You have learned the ways from the outside world — now you can use them for your inner alchemy.
So let me repeat it. There are many homosexuals here, lesbians too, and that’s natural because there are so many Jews here. And in a way there is some relationship why they are here, why they are attracted towards me; there is some reason in it. Homosexuals, lesbians, they are always inventive people… in fact, they have invented homosexuality. They are always revolutionary people, they are never orthodox. They have discovered a new way in their sexual life. Mm? — they have improved upon nature, they have moved away from nature. They are inventive people, they are not traditional. Hence, more and more homosexuals will be coming to me, because whatsoever I am saying is so untraditional, only very revolutionary minds can come to me. But then there is going to be trouble too. You become attracted towards me because my teachings are so untraditional, so rebellious; you become attracted. My teachings are rebellious, my teachings are unorthodox, but I cannot support any lie. I cannot say to you that your homosexuality is as it should be. I cannot support it… and if you are really revolutionary, try to find out a way.
Go into nature and see. Animals become homosexual only when they are put in a strange situation, otherwise not. In a zoo, animals become homosexual, but never in nature — rarely. In nature they always turn to be heterosexual. In a zoo, they can turn homosexual because they cannot find the female, or the female cannot find the male. That’s an unnatural condition, an artificial condition.
Man also turns homosexual when he is in an unnatural situation. It is not natural — and that is why so many people are turning all over the world, because the whole human situation is very unnatural today; it has never been so unnatural. Everything is artificial. We have gone far away from nature in every other way, so we are going far away from nature in sexuality also. Everything is interlinked and connected. You live in an artificial house, you live with artificial mechanisms, you live in an artificial world — the asphalt roads, technology — everything is artificial. Naturally, your sexual energies will start becoming artificial too.
Man is living in a zoo; it is not a human society, because it is not natural. Hence, sexuality is becoming more and more perverted, finding perverted ways — and I can understand it. The more man has become intelligent, he wants to find new ways: and homosexuality is a new way — so contrary to nature; an invention, a discovery that you can relate man-to-man or woman-to-woman.
There are people who are even more revolutionary. They are relating to false toys. You can make a woman, a plastic woman, and make love to her. That is even more revolutionary — and more convenient too. any moment you can pack her back in your bag, and you can carry her anywhere you want. Homosexuality is more convenient than heterosexuality because the language is the same. But convenience is not the goal: growth is the goal. Growth always happens through inconvenience. Growth always happens through pain, challenge.
If you are interested in spiritual growth, move towards heterosexuality. If you are not interested in that, then there is no problem. If you want to go beyond, if you really want to search your innermost being, the inner space, then heterosexuality will be helpful. Just as I said to you: first stage is masturbatory, second stage is homosexual, third stage is heterosexual, fourth stage is asexual — that is the state of BRAHMACHARYA, celibacy. And only when you have achieved to the fourth stage will you be able to penetrate to the uttermost core of your being — otherwise not.
A masturbatory person remains childish, a homosexual person remains juvenile, a heterosexual person remains animal. These stages have to be passed. Don’t get stuck anywhere. And I am not condemning, remember always; I have no condemnation for anything. Sometimes homosexuals come to me and they say, “But Beloved Master, we feel it is good.” I say, “Okay. If you feel good, it is your life. Who I am to condemn it, and for what? Why should I condemn it? It is your life; if you decide to live it in this way, good. Live it with all my blessings.” But I feel sorry, deep down — sorry because their growth will be hindered, sorry because they will not know what great possibilities they were carrying within themselves.
Sex is not an ordinary thing. It is one of the most substantial parts of your being. One should not be so unalert about it. It is the foundation of your being: you are born through sex, you live through sex; your birth is through sex, your youth is through sex, your love is through sex, and your death is going to happen through sex. Your whole life is a sexual affair. One should be very very alert and watchful of what one is going to do with one’s sex energy.
Source – from Osho Book “The Divine Melody”
http://www.oshoteachings.com/osho-homosexuality-ha...
-
Re: Osho sull'omosessualitàtl;dr, ma se volevi dimostrare che Malattia e' frocio, hai ragione
!
`"la realta' non e' cosi' terrificante come vogliono farti credere" - Giambo ` - Wakko che cita Giambo
-
-
Re: Osho sull'omosessualitàScritto daNon Autenticatoil 2012-05-31 09:24:16.0 alle 2012-05-31 09:24:16.0Scritto da:
>But there are three planes of love. They have to be understood.
>
> The first is auto, the second is homo, the third is hetero.
Già qui si capisce che il tizio non sa di che parla!
È come dire che ci sono tre tipi di gusti alimentari: vegetariano, carnivoro e cannibale.
-
Re: Osho sull'omosessualitàScritto daSAMURAIL'Ostinatoil 2012-05-31 22:22:46.0 alle 2012-05-31 22:22:46.0Trollate totali: 6492Già qui si capisce che il tizio non sa di che parla!
Osho sa bene di che cosa parla. E' stato l'unico Maestro spirituale che ha parlato apertamente di sesso senza tabù e pregiudizi. Ma lui parla della sessualità da un punto di vista trascendentale che non sempre è compreso. Anche riguardo ai gusti alimentari, il primo passo è essere carnivori e il successivo vegetariani; ma ci sono anche i vegani e i veganic. Mettiamoci anche i crudisti. Infatti per un vegetariano normale è meglio mangiare vegetali perché è meno tossico per la salute. Per un vegetariano religioso è meglio mangiare vegetali perché non si fa uccidere gli animali e così non soffrono. Per un vegetariano ecologista direbbe che è meglio mangiare vegetali perché allevare animali per mangiarli è controproducente in quanto sottrae alimenti vegetali alla popolazione e inquina molto. Quindi, come ti ho mostrato, ci sono varie tipologie di vegetariani e tutti possono avere ragione. I cannibali possono dirti che mangiando qualcun altro assimilano le qualità dell'altro. Se mangiavi il cuore del nemico acquistavi il suo coraggio. Oppure puoi essere cannibale per necessità: molte specie animali sono cannibali. Osho parla giustamente dei tre livelli della sessualità. La cosa che non mi trova d'accordo con lui è che non necessariamente uno deve passare al livello tre tralasciando il due e raggiungere il livello due tralasciando il livello uno. In definitiva: si può essere contemporaneamente sia etero che gay che onanisti: una cosa non esclude l'altra.
-
Re: Osho sull'omosessualitàScritto daNon Autenticatoil 2012-06-01 00:00:05.0 alle 2012-06-01 00:00:05.0Scritto da: SAMURAI
> Già qui si capisce che il tizio non sa di che parla!
> Osho sa bene di che cosa parla. E' stato l'unico Maestro spirituale che ha parlato apertamente di sesso senza tabù e pregiudizi.
Dice che esistono due tipi di amore: quello etero e quello omo...
Cazzate.
Esiste anche l'amore per i bambini (pedosessualità), e quello per gli animali (zoosessualità), che poi si divide in un amore a parte per ogni specie esistente.
Quello non ha nessuna qualifica... è solo uno che emula il vecchio saggio del villaggio, senza sapere che i giovani hanno capito più di lui.
-
Re: Osho sull'omosessualitàScritto daSAMURAIL'Ostinatoil 2012-06-01 14:36:48.0 alle 2012-06-01 14:36:48.0Trollate totali: 6492
NON AUTENTICATO dice:
Quello non ha nessuna qualifica... è solo uno che emula il vecchio saggio del villaggio, senza sapere che i giovani hanno capito più di lui.
Osho era un professore di Filosofia e insegnava proprio ai giovani, poi ha abbandonato la scuola per un suo cammino spirituale. A Poona in India ha fondato il suo Ashram dove negli anni 70/80 sono confluiti migliaia di persone. Era chiamato: "Il Guru del sesso" perchè parlava apertamente di sessualità in una contesto, quello indiano-induista-musulmano non molto incline a questi discorsi. Da lui affluivano principalmente occidentali in quanto Osho capì che le meditazioni e gli insegnamenti tradizionali orientali non si adattavano alla mentalità occidentale. Alla fine degli anni '80 si trasferì in America in Oregon dove fondo una cittadina aperta a nuove ricerche dello spirito ed esistenziali. Ma la sua mentalità aperta sul sesso e anticonformista in una società puritana e cristiana come quella americana gli fu fatale: la polizia lo arrestò con accuse assurde, lo trattenne in carcere diverse settimane e lo rilasciò. Lui tornò in India ma morì poso dopo e si seppe poi che fu avvelenato mentre era in carcere mescolando elementi radioattivi alle pietanze che gli venivano servite. Ma Osho ha continuato a parlare apertamente di sessualità ponendo l'accento però che noi non siamo solo un corpo fisico ma anche una entità spirituale. Questa è una delle tante vite che abbiamo vissuto. La nostra natura spirituale è eterna ma il corpo è temporaneo e quindi una volta che il corpo muore l'anima ne sceglie un altro e un altro in un susseguirsi di rinascite o reincarnazioni. Infatti le condizioni in cui una persona vive dipende da ciò che ha seminato nel passato non solo in questa vita ma anche in altre vite. Spesso i bambini piccoli ricordano perfettamente alcune loro vite e anche vari adulti ricordano vite passate. Con l'ipnosi regressiva alcune volte si può rivivere anche una vita passata. Quindi, tornando a noi, Osho conosce bene la sessualità e ha definito la nostra evoluzione individuale nel sesso in tre fasi primarie: autoerotismo, omosessualità ed eterosessualità. Nell'omosessualità o nell'eterosessualità ci può stare anche la pedofilia, etero o omosessuali (com'era nell'antica Grecia); ma bada bene: Osho non ha mai condannato nessuna sessualità ne colpevolizzato nessuno. Lui ha una educazione e una impostazione orientale ma ha viaggiato tutto il mondo e conosce bene le nevrosi degli occidentali legate alla sessualità. Io lo considero uno dei migliori maestri che l'umanità abbia avuto perchè è stato uno dei pochi maestri spirituali a non condannare il sesso. Ti pare poco?
Per info:
http://www.testesso.com/2009/05/25/operazione-socr...
-
Re: Osho sull'omosessualitàOsho ha preso il veda e il buddhismo indiano, tradizioni per nulla a tenuta stagna nella filosofia indiana, e le ha "tradotte" e rese appetibili a hippie occidentali che non avevano voglia di imparare il sanscrito e approfondire lo studio di quella tradizione filosofica, perchè sarebbe venuto fuori che....
vabbè, fottesega di criticare un radicalchic, ha il suo senso leggersi osho se appunto non si è in grado di affrontare queste risorse, ad esempio per cominciare con una bibliografia decente.
http://faculty.washington.edu/kpotter/
Please consider the environment before printing this message, 50% of the above is useless!-
Re: Osho sull'omosessualitàScritto daNon Autenticatoil 2012-06-01 14:52:21.0 alle 2012-06-01 14:52:21.0Scritto da: dada216
> Osho ha preso il veda e il buddhismo indiano, tradizioni per nulla a tenuta stagna nella filosofia indiana, e le ha "tradotte" e rese appetibili a hippie occidentali che non avevano voglia di imparare il sanscrito e approfondire lo studio di quella tradizione filosofica, perchè sarebbe venuto fuori che....
>
> vabbè, fottesega di criticare un radicalchic, ha il suo senso leggersi osho se appunto non si è in grado di affrontare queste risorse, ad esempio per cominciare con una bibliografia decente.
>
> http://faculty.washington.edu/kpotter/
dado ma tu fai finta di aver letto tutta quella roba?
-
-
Re: Osho sull'omosessualitàScritto daNon Autenticatoil 2012-06-01 18:41:21.0 alle 2012-06-01 18:41:21.0William sai se Osho abbia mai parlato esplicitamente di pedofilia ?
mi interessa molto ,scommetto che lo sai
dammi delle citazioni se le trovi-
Re: Osho sull'omosessualitàScritto daNon Autenticatoil 2012-06-01 19:12:17.0 alle 2012-06-01 19:12:17.0> William sai se Osho abbia mai parlato esplicitamente di pedofilia ?
>
> mi interessa molto ,scommetto che lo sai
>
> dammi delle citazioni se le trovi
Tanto è morto, lo hanno avvelenato in carcere mettendogli elementi radioattivi nei cibi.
-
-
-
-
-
-